UK says it is not at war after Iranian drone strikes RAF Akrotiri base in Cyprus

Britain is not at war, the government said on Monday, despite saying it would allow the US to use British bases during its war with Iran and after a Royal Air Force base in Cyprus was struck by a Tehran-made drone.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

“The UK is not at war,” Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer said.

Iran has ballistic missiles “pointed at the Gulf and it is vital that those missile launchers are taken out in the face of these completely reckless attacks,” Falconer told the BBC.

UK officials say an attack drone hit the runway at RAF Akrotiri, a British air force base in Cyprus, late on Sunday. There were no injuries and “minimal” damage, but the strike brought the conflict onto EU soil.

It was not immediately clear whether the drone was launched from Iran or by a Tehran-backed militant group such as Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Some 12 hours later, sirens sounded again as two Typhoon fighter jets and a pair of F-35 warplanes roared into the air.

A local resident showed the media a text message sent from base authorities warning of an “ongoing security threat” and urging people to stay indoors and away from windows.

The Cypriot government said two drones headed for Cyprus were intercepted on Monday.

Akrotiri is the UK’s main air base for operations in the Middle East and in recent years has been used by British warplanes on missions against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq and to strike Houthi targets in Yemen.

Britain retained the base, and another on Cyprus, after the eastern Mediterranean island gained independence from British colonial rule in 1960.

It was previously attacked in 1986, when Libyan militants struck the base with mortars, rocket-propelled grenades and small arms, injuring three people.

As tensions between the US and Iran mounted, Britain last month deployed extra F-35 fighter jets to Akrotiri, along with radar, counter-drone systems and air defences, as part of “defensive measures.”

Britain’s defence ministry said on Monday that families of UK personnel who live on the base were being moved to nearby accommodation as a precaution.

Ambivalence in Westminster

British officials have refused to say whether the UK supports the US-Israeli intervention in Iran. They have said that Tehran should not be able to have a nuclear weapon and called for an end to Iranian strikes and a diplomatic solution.

Britain did not take part in the strikes on Iran that began Saturday, and did not allow the US to use UK bases in England or on the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.

But on Sunday, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that he had agreed to let the US use the bases for attacks on Iran’s missiles and their launch sites. He said the change came in response to Iranian attacks on UK interests and Britain’s allies in the Gulf, and is legal under international law.

Britain says its bases cannot be used for attacks on political and economic targets in Iran.

“We are not joining these strikes,” Starmer stressed, “but we will continue with our defensive actions in the region.”

US President Donald Trump told the Daily Telegraph on Monday he was “very disappointed in Keir” and the prime minister “took far too long” to change his mind about the use of British bases.

Unpredictable consequences

The memory of Iraq remains raw for many in Britain. The decision by then-Prime Minister Tony Blair to join the US-led invasion in 2003 remains one of the most contentious in modern British history.

The subsequent yearslong conflict killed 179 British troops, some 4,500 US personnel and many thousands of Iraqis.

The current government is keen to prevent that happening again, but critics say that attempts to set firm limits on Britain’s involvement could be swept away by a fast-moving conflict.

“We are being drawn in, just as we were in Iraq, following the US into an incredibly dangerous situation,” said John McDonnell, a lawmaker from the governing Labour Party.